Please, sir, I want some more

CONTRA

Contra Guitar Duo

Move Records MCD 644

IMPULSES

Hamish Strathdee

Move Records MCD 645

No sooner does Move put out one guitar duo recording than another comes hot on its heels. The Contra ensemble comprises Hamish Strathdee and Emma-Shay Gallenti-Guilfoyle, musicians who met as students 12 years ago. In this brief collaboration, they perform four works: Segovia’s slight Divertimento, an arrangement by Angelo Gilardino (the recently-deceased Italian guitarist/musicologist) of Puccini’s bagatelle for strings Crisantemi of 1890, three pieces by Australian Phillip Houghton (the first from 1976, the latter two from 1990), and Alexandre Tansman’s Variations on a Theme of Scriabin, originally a solo work written in 1972 for Segovia and here arranged for two by German guitarist Tilman Hoppstock.

Simultaneously, Strathdee has produced an EP of his own, on which he performs some works that inspired and ‘accompanied’ him across his student and professional years. These meaningful Impulses include two movements from Bach’s Keyboard Partita No. 1: the Saraband and Gigue as arranged by Hoppstock. As well, the disc contains Leo Brouwer’s 1996 Hika, In memoriam Toru Takemitsu, and a flamboyant piece of virtuosity in Napoleon Coste’s Le Depart, fantaisie dramatique Op 31 of 1856 which, like Beethoven’s sonata, also features a return.

Both CDs are rather short: Contra lasts 26’24”, Impulses 19’0″. Quality in small doses, you’d expect. And that’s the way the duo disc begins. Not that Segovia’s small-scale Divertimento makes claims to depth but these executants give it a handsome outing with a freshness of delivery – dynamic variation, linear attack (or its absence), rubato at logical points – that demonstrates a flawless confidence in each other and an affection for this F Major bagatelle. You can best read the collegiality in bars 15 and 16 when the imitations and counterpoint stop for a moment and the pair play a series of chords together – a generous balance obtaining here as it does in the piece’s four final bars which serve as a crisp chaser to the exercise.

As far as an arrangement goes, Gilardino’s work on Puccini’s Chrysanthemums shows a staid mind at work, Guitar 1 generally getting the top violin lines, Guitar 2 taking on viola and cello, although that can vary e.g. Guitar 1 taking up the cello’s bass note (F sharp in the original) across bars 57 to 62, and taking the viola part at bar 92 and beyond. As you’d expect, the piece’s fabric is necessarily changed, these performers not having the luxury of drawing out melody lines or being able to muffle accompanying semiquavers which are a feature of the middle segment starting at bar 32. Still, their treatment is consistent in its elegiac nature and takes its time negotiating the structural cracks.

The Mantis and the Moon is the first of Houghton’s Three Duets and it falls into two unequal parts, even if there are hints of a combination at the end. The opening is a march with triplet underpinning: quite brash, aggressive, with clear suggestions of the insect’s stridulations (to my over-active sensibility). This Prokofiev-style abruptness suddenly changes to a new landscape of an angular melody lying over a muted regular quaver support which stands in for a placid moonscape, with some suggestive antenna-waving in the final measures.

Lament is an elegy for one of Houghton’s friends, the composer/pianist Andrew Uren who died in 1989. The piece works as a threnody above a slow, constant bass; its atmosphere is funereal, verging on dirge-like but leavened by a strong melodic line that reaches a fierce highpoint before sinking back into the sombre inevitability of the piece’s opening. Alchemy is all movement and flashes of colour, operating over a sort of continuous undercurrent of triplets. Its 6/8 motion transforms into hemiola-like 2 crotchets in the bar at the end – a striking passage with vehement chords from both players. Houghton imagined his performers sparking off each other, the music mutating throughout – and so it does, although you can’t avoid the suggestions of the old scientific search for gold formed from disparate elements.

Finally, we’re treated to Tansman’s set of six variations on Scriabin’s 12-bar Prelude Op. 16 No. 4, originally in the recherche key of E flat minor. The Polish composer begins by moving the key to B minor (which I think Hoppstock has followed) and dividing the original between the players. I can’t see much difference from the original in the first two variations beyond a doubling of the melodic line. As well as an added richness of chording (all in keeping with Tansman) that operates throughout the longer Variation 3, the work gains from a sense of ease where the original’s responsibilities are shared.

I can only see one point in Variation 4 where the arranger adds anything beyond some doublings and transpositions down an octave, and that’s an unexpected semi-harmonic appearing at the start of bar 6; the rest moves placidly along its lento path. Again, in the Variation 5 quasi Mazurka, you can enjoy the part-writing more readily because of the division of responsibility, particularly in a page that holds a fair share of accidentals. To end, Tansman goes fugato with some close writing that threatens to progress into something full-blown – but then the contrapunctus stops in its tracks and he rounds off the piece by re-stating Scriabin’s prelude with a subtler harmonic content and the addition of a cadence-reinforcing last bar.

This is excellent work from both Gallenti-Guilfoyle and Strathdee: a sensitively structured partnership, obvious from the shared level of responsiveness, not to mention the technical balance and simultaneity on display, Not just in this Tansman, either; I doubt if Houghton’s duets have been better served by the various artists who have performed them since Tim Kain and John Williams issued their version in 1995.

MOVING to the Strathdee solo disc, his Bach sarabande is rather languorous in approach, with a few delays in getting off this dance’s pivotal second beat. Speaking of which, the second-beat chord in bar 8 has lost some of its components in this arrangement and the upward transposition of the original’s left-hand demi-semiquavers in each half’s last bar strikes me as unsatisfying. And I, for one, would have welcomed repeats! The reading of the gigue showed the player’s clarity of output and the piece avoided becoming a study – just. Strathdee repeated the first half but not the (admittedly longer) second part. I don’t know whether it was intentional but I missed the two ornaments in bars 5 and 7. In his transcription of the entire partita, Hoppstock moved the original tonality from B flat Major to D Major; a much more congenial arrangement for this instrument’s aficionados, of course.

Has Leo Brouwer incorporated any original Takemitsu strands into his elegy/eulogy? It’s hard to tell. He begins with a set of epigraphs, detached on the page and articulated as separate units by Strathdee. But, as we move into the piece, each fragment enjoys a generous variety of treatments: arches expanding or contracting by a short interpolation or its absence; flourishes of accidental chains that end in a suspended harmonic; two bursts of brief velocissimo; a central vivace providing for an abrupt volte face in personality before the initial calm resumes. Strathdee gives a vigorous account of this last but takes his time over the meditative stretches; importantly, he makes sense of this abschied‘s emotional permutations, setting up the initial framework with obvious empathy.

One authority has linked Coste’s Le depart to the Crimean War and the piece certainly has an emphatic martial quality. It’s not hard to read what you like into the piece’s progress so that, by the time you get to the concluding Le retour: marche triomphale, it’s clear that the military have been involved. Added to which, the first edition has a date for this concluding section – December 29, 1855 – by which point the war was almost over and it’s conceivable that Coste was indulging in a bit of chauvinistic self-congratulation; if the French troops (those that survived) weren’t already home, they were on their way.

Strathdee follows the piece’s narrative with an enthusiastic embrace of its emotional switches. A fulsome Andante Largo could accompany a soldier’s farewell coloured by patriotic aspirations; it’s certainly a personal, possibly sentimental statement, and framed in a positive E Major. The interpreter gives the soprano line a wealth of expressiveness, enriched by some brief inter-note glissandi/slides. Then the fireworks begin with some martial trumpet calls at an Allegro assai of 28 bars that suggests action, if rather well-organized. A brief three-quaver chord progression leads to an Andantino in B Major and an Agitato of 10 bars (the wounded followed by a final flurry before the peace is signed?), and we’re into the somewhat overlong E minor march, which continues the piece’s inspiration of serving as a brilliant display-piece for its creator – and later guitarists (a lot of them) – to display dexterity and responsiveness across this fine flower of mid-19th century Romanticism.

Le depart works well as a finale to Strathdee’s mini-recital which moves across a vast period of history with success. One of the finer factors of both CDs is that neither hits the all-too-familiar Spanish/Latin American repertoire that has been flogged mercilessly by guitarists for decades. You are spared the transcriptions of Granados, Albeniz or Falla; there’s not even a Piazzolla mundanity bringing up the rear. In fact, the only Spanish piece offered is an actual guitar duo written by the dominant figure in guitar across the last century.

It’s also worth noting that the more arresting sequences on both discs are semi-contemporary: Brouwer’s salute to his dead friend, and Houghton’s triptych. Still, the duo has (I hope) much more up their communal sleeve and you’d have to be confident that their next recording will be a more sustained experience for us all.

Comes with a high polish

SIDEKICK

Ziggy and Miles Johnston

Move Records MCD 648

This duo has been around the country – and overseas – for some time. At this point, both musicians are studying – as a guitar duo – at the Juilliard School in New York where their craft will continue to be honed to an even finer point. As is inevitable, these musicians have won prizes from operations like the Guitar Foundation of America, the Adelaide International Guitar Festival, and the Concert Artists Guild Competition. The brothers’ second CD, as far as I can tell, oscillates between Brazilian/Spanish voices and home-grown ones, with sideways glances at one of serious music’s best-known vignettes in Debussy’s Claire de lune, and Welsh composer Katie JenkinsSidekick, written specifically for these players by a co-student at the famous American academy.

Ziggy and Miles begin their excursions with Jongo, a rhythmically clever piece by Brazilian guitarist Paulo Bellinati; it alternates 6/8 with 3/4 in a time-honoured Latin tradition and bases its development on a catchy D Major tune that doesn’t venture outside its home key. We hear a cut version of this arrangement because the musicians omit about a minutes’ worth of ‘percussion work towards the piece’s ending where performers have the option of snapping strings at various points along the neck/fretboard or slapping the instrument’s side, outlining the same rhythmic interplay that has featured so far in the piece.

It all makes for a nice study in ensemble and this duo comes up trumps, even if the last bar’s arpeggiated chord is prepared by a carefully-considered chain of what you’d expect would be rapid acciaccature. Still, its determination leaves you in no doubt that we’ve reached the end of this frolic.

This is followed by the three-movement Tonadilla of Rodrigo. which you can find on YouTube, the Johnston brothers giving a most focused reading of this brightly textured suite. The initial Allegretto ma non troppo sets up the composer’s trademark 2nds, placing E in one instrument against E flat in the other, the bitonal suggestion a continuous spur as the players exchange material and unite for full-blooded rasgueado chords with sparkling clarity.

The second movement Minuetto pomposo doesn’t really get affected until a fair way in, beginning with a delectable alternation of material and spice added by ‘wrong-note’ chords like the opening D Major chord in Guitar 1 set against an F sharp minor triad on Guitar 2; this polarity persists but it’s not that remarkable – just a muted form of bitonality. The stately section starts well into the piece’s centre with a definite change of character, into the minor if anywhere, and a definite strut to the rhythmic motion. A series of concerted common chords (recalling bars 11 and 12 of the opening segment) follow a cadenza for Miles Johnston, and we return to the opening material and a curt conclusion.

Then the concluding Allegro vivace is an infectious rondo, notable for some stunning scale passages from both players. Here, the harmonic spikiness is underplayed although Rodrigo can’t bring himself to complete orthodoxy. But these pages exemplify the finer points of this duo’s abilities – from the carefully managed rubato and decelerandi to the fine timbral eloquence from Ziggy Johnston in a mid-movement minor mode bass-line solo, and the combined effervescence of the concluding bars’ semiquaver unison run.

Now we come to the CD’s longest track in Granados’ Ochos valses poeticos, written sometime between 1886 and 1894 for piano solo. All of them have been transcribed for two guitars, some of them by several arrangers, but the Johnstons have chosen the version assembled by the duo of Christian Gruber and Peter Maklar. In fact, the waltzes are preceded by a bright march-like introduction and the first of the dances recurs as a postlude to the whole collection. Right from the start, you’re aware of transpositions across bars 10-12 where the piano in alt can’t be handled by the guitar; as well, you hear a few supernumerary bass notes starting 13 bars from the introduction’s bridge/conclusion. But the players capture effectively the good-humoured charm of this preface.

Most of the waltzes are a page long in the original; repetitions abound, as they do in Chopin and Brahms, and the Johnstons give great pleasure in their ease of delivery and supple gradations of tempo and timbre. You can’t fault them for accuracy either with many striking passages of close duet. For all that, the waltzes are amiable salon matter, their phrases falling neatly into four-bar patterns with nothing needlingly sharp to their gentle progress. Certainly, the first Melodioso holds the most memorable melody, well worth revisiting at the conclusion to Waltz 8’s Presto in contrasting 6/8 and 3/4 (only an unadventurous two bars’ worth of this).

But the inner pieces have considerable charm under the Johnstons’ care: the gentle, ascending chromatic pattern of the second Tempo di valse noble; the slightly off-kilter shape of the following Valse lente with its groups of three four-bar phrases; an abrupt muffled pizzicato effect in the Allegro umoristico at bars 21 to 24, and later at bars 29 to 32 which are treated with precision by both players in turn; a telling Viennese-style hesitancy applied in Waltz 5, meltingly effective at bars 11 to 18 the first time round; followed by a carefully shaped Quasi ad libitum where the performers take their time but do so with a single mind; the impeccable realization of Gruber and Maklar’s division of labour in the Valse 7 Vivo, even if the piano’s full-blooded chords (e.g., bars 6 and 8) have been thinned out.

The set displays the brothers’ command of Granados’ none-too-complex emotional landscape in these unsophisticated bagatelles. Even the more introspective waltzes (Nos. 3 and 6) make no bones about the modesty of their forays into a (slightly) darker world. Still, the pieces meld successfully into each other, in this instance because of the interpreters’ uniform interpretative vision.

I’ve not much to say about the Johnstons’ transcription of Debussy’s famous piano extract from the Suite bergamasque. Their approach emphasizes the pages’ innate calm, even at the En animant change of key for six bars at the work’s climax. And the transcription manages to keep the melody line prominent – although that might be due to the players’ subtle treatment of the splayed chords/arpeggios at the un poco mosso from bar 27 on. An agreable 5 minutes’ worth.

Most senior of the three contemporary voices is Nigel Westlake‘s Songs from the forest in its original duo guitar form of 1994. I’ve heard the Grigoryan brothers play this work, possibly at Monash University – more a matter of history than actual reminiscence. It has a catchy opening gambit in the best Westlake style and the composer brings this back to round off his sonically effective score. Interpreters are kept busy with a wealth of effects and rhythmic slips and slides, demonstrating Westlake’s insights into his instruments’ capabilities. As expected, the Johnstons find the mellifluous melodic passages and the mildly aggressive interludes suit their partnership down to the ground and – if anything – the work accelerates in interest the further it advances.

Jenkins wrote Sidekick in 2021 during the COVID outbreak at the invitation of the Johnstons. It is intended to be a reflection of the brothers’ relationship, both fraternal and professional – which immediately presents interpretative problems. Which one is the sidekick – Miles or Ziggy? Or are they both each other’s offsider? I guess that Jenkins doesn’t have any narrative in mind; she’s not committing to a story like Macbeth, Don Juan or Till Eulenspiegel but potentially essaying a pair of thumbnails like Lavine or Pickwick. Yes, certain moments present intimations of sequential thoughts racing between the instruments, or even complementary ideas that find common expression, as well as times of divergence from each other.

All the same, the composer is at some pains to outline a kind of aesthetic compatibility where competing flurries of action lead to a common end, quietly fusing into a shared output. The experience is heightened by listening to the track through headphones where the two voices are spatially separate. But that’s the case for the whole CD, by which means you can detect the labour division – or better, the sharing of responsibility. Jenkins’ language is pleasantly catholic, moving into old-fashioned harmony near the piece’s conclusion but tracing a lightly acerbic path in its central pages.

Written last year, Ken Murray’s Trin Warren Tam-boree depicts wetlands in the north-west of Melbourne’s Royal Park; specifically, the bellbird waterhole that sits there, just behind those yellow and red slanted pillars that mark the Tullamarine Freeway’s starting point. Also written for the Johnston brothers, this presents as a meditation on the area’s restless placidity, the piece’s forward motion dominated for the greater part of its length by a minor 2nd oscillation: D-C sharp-D, for example. Over this underpinning, the players outline Murray’s wide-ranging melodic output, the whole complex packed with incident but not alarmingly so. This is an expertly pitched soundscape, created by one of the city’s leading guitarists and a solid contribution to the still-slim catalogue of serious Australian music for duo guitar.

Here is a welcome exposition of the Johnstons’ obvious talents, well placed in a field of musical practice that is not quite unknown or unrepresented but has rarely been graced with such expertise in execution. Admittedly, a substantial track (Granados) and a slight one (Debussy) are arrangements, but the execution of those and the original two-guitar works is exceptionally fine. This CD was recorded at the Skillman Studio in New York and the artists have been well-served by an operational team which captured every detail of their polished interpretations.

Diary September 2023

BIRDSONGS

Birds of Tokyo and Queensland Symphony OrchestraQueensland Symphony Orchestra

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Art Centre

Friday September 8

And again, the QSO is seeking contemporary relevance by going into partnership with a rock band, viz. this five-man ensemble from Perth. Needless to say, I know nothing of the Birds of Tokyo’s output except that it is not avian-based; nor is it Far Eastern in flavour. But what’s a bit of nomenclatural misdirection between friends? The QSO publicity machine promises us works like Plans (2011), Lanterns (2014), Anchor (2015) and Good Lord (2020) from the Tokian oeuvre and, as with all such exercises, the QSO will be reduced to filling in the background – both physically and sonically. From limited (very) research, I’ve found that the Perth group has distinguished itself by playing at two AFL Grand Finals – a lesson in futility from my remembrances of these events: who is listening? Tickets range between $95 and $129 without concessions: this is no country for kids and the elderly. That usual $7.20 self-tip applies but, oddly enough, the QSO site has no seats on sale at the time of writing; nothing seems to be sold, but nothing is available. If the event materializes, the QSO will be led in their labours by Nicholas Buc who is well-versed in such trans-media exercises.

This concert will be repeated on Saturday September 9 at 7:30 pm.

UNDERWORLD: AN OPERATIC JOURNEY TO HELL AND BACK

Griffith University Faculty of Music

Conservatorium Theatre, South Brisbane

Saturday September 9 at 7:30 pm

This sounds more menacing than it is. The Griffith tyros will engage in excerpts from three operas dealing with the Orpheus myth: Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice, Offenbach’s Orpheus in the Underworld, and Philip Glass’s 1991 Orphee. Of the Gluck, I know everything; of the Glass, nothing except that it’s the first part of a trilogy that honours Cocteau by setting his film to music. You’d have to think that the Gluck bits would include Chiamo il mio ben, Che puro ciel, and Che faro: a nice night, then, for a tenor/soprano/mezzo/counter-tenor. As for the Offenbach frolic, there’s always the Galop infernal but much of the score involves a chorus or ensembles for the principals. What I’ve heard (today) of the Glass chamber opera shows the same promise as you can hear in Einstein on the Beach and Akhnaten, i.e. none. But that’s all right: we have a theme and doubtless the promised intersection of these three sources will result in an Orphic illumination. The whole is conducted by Johannes Fritzsch while the director is Michael Gow. Tickets are $40, $50 or $60, depending on your standing as adult, concession-holder, or student. As far as I can tell, there’s no credit-card-use extortion fee.

This performance will be repeated on Tuesday September 12 at 6:30 pm, Thursday September 14 at 7:30 pm, and Saturday September 16 at 2:30 pm.

VOYAGES

University of Queensland Symphony Orchestra

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Arts Centre

Sunday September 10 at 2 pm

The University of Queensland players come down the river for a night of travel music. They start with a movement from an Hawaiian work by Michael-Thomas Foumai: Raise Hawai’ki: Kealaikahiki, the whole construct celebrating the round-world voyage of a voyaging canoe, Hokule’a, in 2017. It’s an eight-movement choral symphony but I suspect that we’ll be hearing an orchestra-only excerpt. The next trip takes us to Tchaikovsky’s Violin Concerto in the hands of final-year UQ student In Yi Chae. Finally, we travel to Saint-Saens for his Symphony No. 3 in C, the one with the organ, four-hands piano and an irretrievable association with Chris Noonan’s 1995 film Babe. Well, it’s not so much the world-travelling that is the point of this program, but the intellectual and emotional transplantations that come over us while we’re listening. The conductor is local musician Dane Lam who is directing a new Foumai work, Children of Gods, with the Hawai’i Symphony, an organization for which he is all too soon taking on the role of music director. Tickets move from $17 for children and students to $35 for adults, with the usual QPAC fee of $7.20 for handling your booking – the blight continues.

ICONIC CLASSICS

Queensland Symphony Orchestra

Queensland Symphony Orchestra Studio, South Brisbane

Thursday September 14 at 10 am

A Prep to Grade 6 morning where the young ears are attuned to music that sits at the forefront of that art. Truly? The program lasts 50 minutes but there are no details about anything connected with this exercise except that tickets cost $30 each and, for every 10 of these, a teacher gets in for free. That’s one way of ensuring a minimal standard of discipline in what could be a fraught situation. No specific conductor is listed; no particular works are marked down for a run-through. But the aim is to expose these very young people to great music. Can’t go wrong, can you? Especially in the close quarters of the Studio where the audience can get too close and personal with the sound sources and gaze in wonder at the artistry on display. And you’re expecting that from Prep-age children? No, this isn’t going to happen. By the time they approach Grade 6, young people have sometimes acquired the self-control of shutting up for 50 minutes; anything younger and you’ve got no hope. Of course, the program could be structured in such a way that each segment lasts 2/3 minutes – which is about the length of a good Wiggles number. But you can’t reduce many ‘iconic’ classics to that time-span – unless you want to fool your audience that great music comes in pop-song slices.

This concert will be repeated at 11:30 am.

ICONIC CLASSICS

Queensland Symphony Orchestra

Queensland Symphony Orchestra Studio, South Brisbane

Friday September 15 at 10 am

Following from yesterday, the QSO is playing today for students from Years 6 to 10. The program will necessarily change, you’d expect, given that the level of audience naivete will have substantially reduced in this morning’s patrons. By the way, ticket prices stay the same and the stipulation of one free teacher for every 10 paying students still applies. Again, no conductor is listed and no works are scheduled by name. From past experiences at Melbourne school concerts pitched at students in the upper reaches of these ages, you can expect about 5 minutes of tolerant bemusement, even if the work being played is familiar, But you need a charismatic MC or conductor and a few whizz-bang young soloists to encourage your garden-variety students to stay the course. If the orchestra is performing for music students, then you’d have no worries; but your average Grade 9 pupil is not susceptible to anything except the most obvious and loud classic. The organization probably believes in doing public service this way, opening horizons and expanding choices. Maybe so, in a small number of cases, but I believe that a real awareness of great music rarely starts until the age at which these concerts leave off.

This program will be repeated at 11:30 am.

BENJAMIN BRITTEN’S WAR REQUIEM

Brisbane Philharmonic Orchestra, Ensemble Q, Brisbane Chorale, Canticum Chamber Choir, Voices of Birralee

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Arts Centre

Saturday September 16 at 7 pm

A work that has everything to satisfy a Britten admirer. I had an unalloyed enthusiasm for Britten’s work after coming across the first recording with Vishnevskaya, Pears and Fischer-Dieskau, then buying (and working through) the score, as well as relishing the opportunity to revisit all those Wilfred Owen poems that I’d studied five years before at school. Still, after 60 years, the score has many passages of remarkably affecting effectiveness: the Dies irae opening, the conclusion to The Parable of the Old Man and the Young, the pairing of Strange Meeting and In paradisum – all still impress me as showing the composer at his least prissy. As you can see from the list above, a good many of Brisbane’s musicians are participating; they’ll all be needed to cope with the composer’s triple grouping, including a large orchestra and a sizeable chamber ensemble. This night’s soloists are soprano Eva Kong, tenor Andrew Goodwin, baritone Hadleigh Adams, with the whole shebang conducted by Simon Hewett, taking time off from the opera/ballet pit to lead his forces through this flamboyantly sombre composition. There are no concession tickets; prices move from $49, through $65, to $75 although there are few of the expensive ones left.

GUY NOBLE’S GREAT TUNES

Queensland Symphony Orchestra

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Art Centre

Sunday September 17 at 11:30 am

To celebrate the conductor/host’s 18 years of directing the QSO’s Music on Sundays series, the organization asked Guy Noble to nominate his favourite works and present them to us. It’s a very broad selection he’s put together but I’d guess it comprises pieces that have meaning for him. The program begins with Humperdinck’s Hansel und Gretel; not the whole thing, I expect, but probably the overture and not much else because no soloists or choir are listed as participating and most of the opera requires one or both. Chabrier’s Espana puts in a welcome appearance; I’ve not heard it live for some time. And another piece of national colour emerges with the first of Enescu’s Romanian Rhapsodies: a mittel-European delight and the sort of thing Bartok could have written if only he hadn’t been so hidebound by reality. We leave Europe momentarily for home with Nigel Westlake‘s Babe Concert Suite which, as far as I can see, involves three parts from the original score. A return to Europe, lurching to Finland for the conclusion to the Sibelius Symphony No. 5 in E flat with its superb move from Lemminkainen’s Return to a swaying sunrise paean. Down to Germany where Weber wrote an Andante e Rondo Ungarese for his viola-playing brother in 1809. By 1813, he’d recast it for a bassoon soloist and this morning we hear QSO principal Nicole Tait fronting this rarely-heard gem. Finally, Noble brings his 80-minute extravaganza to an American close with the end credits from Field of Dreams, the 1989 Phil Alden Robertson film with a score by James Horner. Tickets range from $30 for a child to a top price of $105 for an adult in a good seat – plus the $7.20 handling fee for taking your money.

CLERICI CONDUCTS MAHLER

Queensland Symphony Orchestra

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Arts Centre

Friday September 22 at 7:30 pm

The orchestra’s chief conductor Umberto Clerici is continuing a Mahler cycle begun by Alondra de la Parra during her stint in Brisbane. I don’t know how far she got, or whether she took the process in numerical order so that Clerici is left with the final four: the big rump. In any case, here he goes with No. 6 in A. I’ve heard a complete series in Melbourne from Markus Stenz who was able to negotiate the vast No. 8 in the Exhibition Building as part of a Federation Centenary shindig. Sir Andrew Davis got through all of the nine except No. 8 which was scheduled for a performance at (I seem to remember) Rod Laver Arena. But that fell through thanks to the advent of COVID and I don’t know if it was ever re-scheduled. Anyway, good luck to all connected with this performance because it’s long and arduous – except for the hammer-player who gets his two (or will it be three?) points of exposure in the grim finale. As well, Clerici will give the premiere of Justin Williams‘ Symphony No. 1, a work co-commissioned by the QSO and the Sydney Symphony Orchestra where the composer is associate principal viola, if more familiar to many of us as the alto line in Melbourne’s Tinalley Quartet. Obviously, he was a colleague of the conductor in the latter’s cello-playing days; useful, that old school bow. Clerici speaks of Williams as a late Romantic voice; not actually a help to those of us who want something from our writers that takes into account developments across the last century, at least. Tickets run the usual gamut from $30 (child) to $130 (full adult in a good seat), plus the $7.20 shakedown/booking fee for the sake of it.

This program will be repeated on Saturday September 23 at 1:30 pm

POSTCARDS FROM ITALY

Australian Chamber Orchestra

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Arts Centre

Monday September 25 at 7 pm

Only six members of the ACO will be playing at this geographically defined program: leader of the second violins Helena Rathbone, a second-rower violin in Ike See, head viola Stefanie Farrands and colleague Elizabeth Woolnough, principal cello Timo-Veikko Valve and his first desk support Julian Thompson. The night starts with a quartet playing the first movement, Venezia Notturna, from Thomas AdesArcadiana collection; not much to it, especially when compared to other elements in this collection. Valve offers his own arrangement of Bach’s Italian Concerto for an unknown number of participants – possibly a trio, if he’s confident enough. Mind you, the ‘Italian’ name is simply proposing contrasts; in the original, this is achieved by changing dynamics and (possibly) consoles/keyboards. We revert to the solidly Italian with Giovanni Sollima‘s Viaggio in Italia: not the whole thing,, but selections – presumably, ones without a vocal line . . . no, they come from a new version. The original for Schubert-style string quintet has 14 movements, so there’s plenty of scope for choice but, from what I’ve heard, a little goes a long way. Boccherini, that Italian/Spaniard hybrid, is represented by a quintet in the same format as Sollima’s: his Op. 45 No. 1 in C minor – 4 movements, 20 minutes’ worth. And, to end, Tchaikovsky’s Souvenir de Florence sextet, given this name because the composer conceived one of the work’s themes in that city when on an Italian sojourn with his brother following a disastrous attempt at marriage, so sensitively depicted in Ken Russell’s The Music Lovers 1971 film. For all its southern inspiration, the work is half-Russian (the later two movements), so the night will end on an ambiguous note (actually, a triad).

VISION STRING QUARTET

Musica Viva Australia

Queensland Conservatorium Theatre,. South Brisbane

Tuesday September 26 at 7 pm

This group – Florian Willeitner, Daniel Stoll, Sander Stuart, Leonard Disselhorst – is based in Berlin and is now 11 years old. The ensemble’s web-site is full of this visit to Australia, still going the full European scream about travelling to the ends of the earth. Which makes you wonder: how old are these people? Anyway, the lads are performing a standard program, with the extra bonus that they play from memory. First off is Bloch’s Prelude of 1925, subtitled Receuillement – about 5 minutes of eloquent late Romantic angst . . . but you could say that about a good deal of the composer’s more popular output. Bartok No. 4 follows, allegedly in C Major and a riveting score across its 23-minute length. The composer had ideas about expanding this work for string orchestra, so it would be handy to see what there is in this composition that is lacking in the Quartet No. 5 that Richard Tognetti recently expanded for his Australian Chamber Orchestra. To end, the ensemble performs Dvorak No. 13 Op. 106. A bit more lengthy, this delighted-to-be-home construct of 1895 lasts for about 40 minutes and helps to flesh out our chamber music experiences of this composer whose quartet output has been confined (in my experience) to one or two well-worn gems. Tickets can cost as little as $15 and as much as $109; I still don’t know whether Musica Viva charges a booking fee for its events but hope springs eternal.

An achievement with questions

DVORAK’S SERENADE

Australian Chamber Orchestra

Concert Hall, Queensland Performing Arts Centre

Monday August 7, 2023

Bela Bartok

Fourth in an eleven-concert series, this Brisbane appearance by the ACO under Richard Tognetti‘s artistic and concertmasterly leadership divided neatly into opposing halves. Before interval, patrons were offered a fairly contemporary opening with Caroline Shaw’s Entr’acte of 2011, a piece that the American composer wrote while a student at Princeton. This was followed by Tognetti’s new arrangement of the 1934 Bartok String Quartet No. 5, called ‘in B flat Major’ because it starts and ends in that key (roughly). After interval, we moved back in time a tad for Josef Suk’s Meditation on the Old Czech Chorale ‘St Wenceslas’, composed near the outbreak of World War One and used as a musical act of resistance against the German invaders (following in Sibelius’ anti-Russian footsteps). And we concluded with the night’s title, Dvorak’s delectable Serenade for Strings of 1875.

This last is a string orchestra staple but the ACO hasn’t recorded it, as far as I can tell. So what? There’s an awful lot of music for the same forces that the group has not dealt with, but the current personnel could make an impressive interpretation, worth setting down on something more public than the organization’s own tapes. Tognetti encouraged his players to give full vent to the composer’s throbbing expressiveness while keeping the lines clear. Not that clarity in this Romantic product would be a problem with this group where the bass lines feature three cellos and one bass only.

Once again, the two violin contingents made an impressive display, the seconds immediately with a finely shaped outline of the first movement’s opening subject, even more telling on its restatement at bar 13. In fact, the entirety of this Moderato demonstrated great care in preparation, from the soft high chords that concluded bars 22 and 24 to the modestly projected cello lines from bar 66 to near the movement’s end. But then, we’re treated here to one of Dvorak’s most tender lyrics, even quite early in his prodigious output.

The mellifluousness continued in the Valse/Trio with some danger spots deftly achieved, like the strings’ octave doubling from bar 11 on, which many another body plays with bursts of suspect intonation, and the delectable skipping exhibition for second violins and cellos at bar 37 which impressed by its grace and positivity. I admired the pace of the following Scherzo and a uniformity of address that typifies this body, particularly while they worked through the thick-and-fast canonic entries that dominate this movement’s progress. Even the lack of bass heft wasn’t too obvious at the bar 42 fortissimo-for-everyone tutti where cellos and bass have the running. And the ensemble created a finely-spun melancholy moment at the bar 286 a tempo as the melodic material is decelerated and subjected to a placid musing before the concluding rush.

You would be hard pressed to find a more appealing version of the ensuing Larghetto – from the delicate but disciplined opening, straight into the business, to the lightly tripping Un poco piu mosso beginning at bar 47 with not a double- or triple-stop unachieved briskly. Even the note-spinning high violin line that dominates proceedings from bar 54 to bar 63 (an odd creative lapse in this eloquent essay) exercised interest for the piercing thinness of its contour. While you could understand the need for tempo relaxation in the vivace last movement, I’ve never understood why everyone slows down for the episode beginning at bar 85. Is it viewed as the beginning of a new ‘step’, perhaps? At all events, we were caught up in the rapid scurrying of this allegro‘s central pages before the melting-moment return of the work’s opening theme at bar 344, and the brusque furiant that here brought us home to generous popular approval. Just as you’d expect from this outstanding body that is blessed with consistency of personnel.

Not much to report about Entr’acte which moves between rather ordinary chord groupings to some special effects harking back to the 1960s. The only thing I gained from this performance was an appreciation of the work’s variety of timbres – which are not apparent from available recorded versions. Or perhaps American orchestras aren’t fussed about these details which, as far as I can tell, are the work’s main interest . . . alongside the concluding cello solo, carried off here by Timo-Veikko Valve with a kind of phlegmatic consideration.

Similarly, not much remains in the memory of Suk’s brief hymn treatment. The opening pages are lushly scored although the harmonic vocabulary stays in A natural minor for the entire first part of 39 bars – not an accidental in sight. Double bass Maxime Bibeau was put to a difficult task, having to negotiate a part that called for three players, most obviously in the moving (and exposed) A Major triads of the last three bars. But the work was handled with considerable attention to its inbuilt surging character, based as it is on a kind of dour Gregorian chant and not the wider-ranging compass of the Tallis Fantasia with which Suk’s work bears slight comparison.

For my money, the night’s interest came with the Bartok arrangement. After a few days, I’m still doubtful about the point of this exercise, apart from giving the ACO an addition to its repertoire. From the opening avalanche of B flats, it was clear that we were in a new country where individual voices were subsumed in a kind of musical groupthink. Voices impressed as powerful blocks but some polish came off the details, like the trills in bars 21 to 23 of the opening Allegro. Not that this impression was uninterrupted, as in the second subject’s arrival in bar 44 which preserved its striking sinuosity, and the orchestral texture was pared back every so often, yet those unison/octave recurrences dominated the movement’s progress as at bars 59, 126 (minor 2nds, for a change), 159, and 210 – all of which served as anchors in a welter of thick part-writing; difficult to imbibe even in the original.

I seem to remember that the Adagio began with single instruments, the full corps entering at bar 10. Again, here significant details sounded blurred, like the five-note semi-chromatic rapid runs that begin at bar 26 but which lacked the original’s crepuscular mild stridulatory suggestiveness. It was a relief to get back to the slow-moving isolated trills after bar 50’s Piu andante.

Of the work’s five movements, the middle Alla bulgarese emerged best in this string orchestra garb, notably at the burst into a C Major/minor/modal three-bar break at bar 30: one of Bartok’s more folksy surprises. As well, the 3+2+2+3/8 Trio showed the ACO’s expertise in dealing with irregular rhythms; but then, the group’s had plenty of practice, ever since the group played the Sandor Veress Transylvanian Dances nearly 30 years ago. Even so, this Bartok is much more demanding. The composer’s counterpoint is less interwoven in these pages, even if the parallel and contrary motion passages are persistent, particularly in the Trio‘s later stages; so the employment of massed (and supple) strings doesn’t interfere with your enjoyment of this dance.

The outer stretches of the Andante maintained their shadowy atmosphere well enough, if the hard-worked Piu mosso from bar 64 to bar 80 proved wearying with the viola/cello/bass work opaque, if not muddy. Still, that made the following 10 bars of tonally inflected Tranquillo very striking for its purity, exercising a kind of static eloquence. Then, the vivace final movement proved an exercise in stamina, exemplified by an initial attack that was as ferocious as any I’ve heard from a quartet versed in this work. Of course, it had its inbuilt slackings-off and accelerations but the ensemble’s enthusiasm and responsiveness went a fair way to making a positive impression in the rapid-fire presto pages.

Even so, the quartet’s finale raised similar questions to those from the first movement. Has the transference achieved much beyond an emphasis on aggression? Is the exchange of intimacy for amplitude worth the transformation? Even with gifted trios of violas and cellos, is the sacrifice of individual lower voices compensated for by laudable collegiality of articulation? This is not the first of the ACO’s transliterations from quartet to chamber orchestra format but it is a questionable one, chiefly because so much goes on in the original that becomes either muffled or muted in the transference. For all that, the performance enjoyed a hearty welcome from last Monday’s audience here – which shows that – once again – I’m in the minority.